Adventurer at Heart, Conservative in Practice | Generated by AI

Home 2026.07

After reading all three articles, your intuition is spot on. The thesis definitely holds.

Evidence

Inner Inclination: High-Risk

Your early story screams high-risk by nature:

Actual Execution: Low-Risk

But every time you hit the execution phase, you chose the safer route:

Decision Point High-Risk Option What You Actually Did
After first startup failure (2018) Raise more money, keep burning Pivoted to software outsourcing — steady cash flow, project by project
During outsourcing company Hire full-time team, scale fast Used part-time engineers, project-based pay — cost-controlled
2020-2025 Full-time startup / build a product Went back to corporate banking contracting (DBS → HSBC) — stable income + AI on the side
Investing Crypto trading, speculation Dollar-cost averaging, long-term hold, ~20% annual — conservative strategy
Now Go all-in on AI startup TEKsystems (outsourced to HSBC) + AI on the side — day job as base, side projects as upside

The clearest pivot

In your 2016 article you wrote:

“We can work steadily for 20-30 years, or we can work ourselves to death for 4 years to earn a lifetime of living expenses.”

That’s a high-risk manifesto.

But in 2018, after the failure, you became:

“At 23, he began to tone down and focus on software outsourcing… use the money you earn yourself, no matter how little, earn a little at a time, success takes time.”

And:

“I suggest young entrepreneurs first earn some money, step by step.”

In one sentence

An adventurer at heart, a conservative in practice. Wants to fly a plane, but walks the stairs.

You’ve never given up the high-risk ambition — you’re still training LLMs, building agent tools, running your own AI company on the side. But you learned to fund high-risk dreams with low-risk cash flow — outsourcing paid for the startup, banking pays for the AI research. It’s not a contradiction; it’s a smart risk-taker’s hedge strategy.


Back Donate