Unpopular Opinions on AWS Professional Certifications | Generated by AI
Question: What are unpopular opinions about AWS Cloud Professional certificates?
Answer:
Here are some unpopular (or at least controversial / contrarian) opinions about AWS Professional-level certifications (mainly Solutions Architect – Professional (SAP), DevOps Engineer – Professional, and similar advanced ones) that surface in forums, blogs, LinkedIn posts, and certification communities:
-
They don’t actually make you a great architect or engineer.
Passing the SAP exam shows deep AWS trivia and best-practice knowledge, but it doesn’t automatically mean someone can design strong, maintainable, cost-effective, or modern architectures in the real world. Many hiring managers view candidates who lead with “I have the Pro cert” as a mild red flag if hands-on experience or system-design ability isn’t clearly demonstrated. -
The professional certifications are becoming (or have become) somewhat overrated / “worthless badges” for getting hired.
With so many people holding them now (especially after years of hype), the Pro-level certs no longer stand out dramatically on a resume the way they once did. Some experienced people argue they’re more of an expensive checkbox than a meaningful differentiator, especially when companies care far more about real projects, production incidents handled, or cost-optimization track records. -
Studying for them can be a very inefficient way to learn useful AWS skills.
A vocal minority believes the exams force you to memorize a huge amount of edge-case trivia, scenario-specific “AWS-preferred” answers, and rapidly outdated details — time that could be better spent building actual systems, contributing to open-source projects, or lowering bills in production environments. -
Vendor lock-in fears are overblown, but the certs sometimes push overly AWS-centric thinking.
Some argue the Solutions Architect Pro (in particular) rewards designs that lean heavily into managed AWS services — which is great for passing the exam but can create fragile, expensive, hard-to-migrate architectures in the real world. Engineers who prioritize portability or minimal managed-service usage sometimes see the cert content as subtly promoting lock-in. -
For many senior roles, especially outside consulting / AWS partner companies, the Pro certs add surprisingly little value.
In big-tech engineering organizations or product companies that self-host significant infrastructure, interviewers often care much more about distributed systems fundamentals, observability, incident response culture, programming ability, or trade-off reasoning than whether someone knows the exact VPC peering quota or the latest DMS/SCT quirks. -
The ROI is heavily dependent on geography, current job market saturation, and career stage.
In some markets / time periods the certs still open doors (especially for consulting firms, mid-career pivots, or regions where AWS certs carry prestige), but others claim that in 2025–2026, for already experienced cloud people in competitive locations, the professional certs mostly provide bragging rights, a pay bump justification, or internal promotion checkboxes rather than transformative career acceleration.
These views are definitely not the majority opinion — most people in the AWS certification community still regard the Professional certifications very highly for learning depth, resume strength, and salary negotiation leverage. The opinions above tend to come from longer-tenured practitioners, people burned by over-investment in certs without matching experience, or those working in environments where cloud-native architecture patterns matter more than vendor-specific mastery.
References:
- https://medium.com/datamindedbe/hooray-im-an-aws-certified-pro-architect-now-what-89f4d8b22596
- https://www.reddit.com/r/AWSCertifications/comments/1o99o5z/aws_certifications_turning_into_worthless_badges/
- https://dev.to/emmanuelnk/is-the-aws-solutions-architect-certification-worth-it-a-review-2lem