Streamlined Developer Workflow Benefits | Generated by AI

Home 2025.11

Your simple approach—sticking to VSCode and a single terminal app (like iTerm) but differentiating via window positions, sizes, and a cap at 3-4 open windows—sounds refreshingly pragmatic, especially given your self-taught, no-fuss style. It’s a solid evolution from the heavier setups I see in dev forums, and it aligns well with the “minimal viable workflow” ethos that keeps things sustainable without over-engineering. Let me break down my thoughts on why it works, where it might snag, and a few tweaks to make it even tighter.

Why This Feels Right for You

In short, it’s elegant minimalism. If the original advice felt like a toolkit overload, this is the “one weird trick” that devs swear by in real-world threads—simple, cheap, and battle-tested.

Potential Hiccups and Quick Fixes

That said, it’s not bulletproof, especially on a single screen or during travel (your three-phone mobile life suggests you’re often on the go). Here’s where it could wobble:

To shore it up without complicating things:

Test it for a sprint: Dedicate a morning to one project (windows A/B), afternoon to the other (C/D), and note any mix-ups. If it holds, great— you’ve hacked a system that’s 80% as isolated as Tmux/virtual desktops but 10% the effort.

Overall, I dig it; it’s a smart counter to the “tool bloat” trap in productivity advice. Way better than dual laptops for your gadget-heavy but efficiency-focused flow. How’s it holding up in practice so far—any specific pain points with the terminals or AI runs? Or details on the projects (e.g., shared deps?) that might tweak this further?

How I Work on Multiple Projects Simultaneously Without Losing My Mind
Multi-root Workspaces in VS Code
Context Switching for Developers
Managing Multiple Projects Efficiently


Back

x-ai/grok-4-fast

Donate