DNF vs APT Key Differences | Generated by AI
Question: Compare DNF and APT
Answer:
DNF and APT are the two most widely used command-line package managers in Linux, but they belong to different ecosystems.
Key Comparison Table
| Aspect | APT | DNF |
|---|---|---|
| Primary distributions | Debian, Ubuntu, Linux Mint, Pop!_OS, etc. | Fedora, RHEL ≥8, CentOS Stream, Rocky Linux, AlmaLinux, etc. |
| Package format | .deb |
.rpm |
| Underlying low-level tool | dpkg |
rpm |
| Predecessor | apt-get / apt-cache |
yum (DNF = Dandified YUM) |
| Introduced | Early 2000s (very mature) | 2015 (replaced yum in Fedora) |
| Speed (2025–2026 perception) | Generally feels faster & snappier | Much improved (especially DNF5 in newer Fedora), close or sometimes equal to APT |
| Dependency resolution | Very good | Excellent (historically stronger than yum, modular streams support) |
| Cache handling | Needs explicit apt update |
Automatically refreshes metadata when needed |
| Command structure | Multiple tools historically (apt, apt-get, apt-cache) |
Single modern command dnf |
| Output style | Compact, comma-separated lists | Nicer formatted table (version, size, repo, etc.) |
| Remove behavior | remove leaves config filespurge deletes them |
remove usually deletes config files too |
| Module / Streams support | No native (PPAs used instead) | Yes – very powerful (e.g. multiple versions of nginx, python, etc.) |
| Enterprise / Signing focus | Metadata signing | Per-package PGP signing (better for strict corporate auditing) |
| Typical repo size | Very large (especially with PPAs) | Large + growing Flatpak/AppImage integration |
Common Commands Side-by-Side
| Task | APT command | DNF command |
|---|---|---|
| Refresh package index | sudo apt update |
Usually automatic or sudo dnf check-update |
| Upgrade all packages | sudo apt upgrade |
sudo dnf upgrade |
| Install package | sudo apt install firefox |
sudo dnf install firefox |
| Search package | apt search keyword |
dnf search keyword |
| Show package info | apt show package |
dnf info package |
| Remove package | sudo apt remove package |
sudo dnf remove package |
| Remove + config files | sudo apt purge package |
Usually included in remove |
| Autoremove unused deps | sudo apt autoremove |
sudo dnf autoremove |
| List installed packages | apt list --installed |
dnf list installed |
| History / undo | Limited | dnf history, dnf history undo |
Which one is better in 2026?
There is no objectively better package manager — it depends on your distribution:
- Choose APT if you’re using Ubuntu / Debian family → biggest ecosystem, fastest for many users, enormous number of packages + PPAs
- Choose DNF if you’re using Fedora / RHEL family → better modular streams, cleaner enterprise-grade signing story, very good dependency solver, nice output formatting
Performance gap that existed years ago (DNF being noticeably slower) has largely closed thanks to DNF improvements (and DNF5 work in Fedora).
Both are mature, secure, and reliable tools in 2026.
References:
- https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/quick-docs/dnf-vs-apt
- https://opensource.com/article/21/7/dnf-vs-apt
- https://www.ssdnodes.com/blog/package-management-in-linux-use-apt-and-dnf
- https://linuxcommunity.io/t/linux-package-managers-compared-apt-dnf-pacman-and-zypper/5760