Droplets vs Custom Images Explained | Generated by AI
Question: Why do people use Droplets instead of Custom Images, or vice versa, in DigitalOcean or AMD Developer Cloud?
Answer:
In platforms like DigitalOcean or AMD Developer Cloud, Droplets and Custom Images solve different problems. They work together rather than replacing each other.
What is a Droplet?
A Droplet is basically a running virtual machine (VM).
Think of it as:
- CPU
- RAM
- Disk
- Network
- Operating system
- Running processes/services
It is the actual compute instance you SSH into and run workloads on.
Examples:
- LLM inference server
- Kubernetes node
- Jupyter notebook
- Database server
- Web backend
- GPU training machine
In DigitalOcean terminology:
- Droplet = VM instance
- Snapshot/Custom Image = reusable VM template
What is a Custom Image?
A Custom Image is like a saved template or frozen state of a machine.
It usually contains:
- OS
- Installed packages
- CUDA/ROCm
- Python environments
- Docker images
- SSH configs
- Model weights
- Your project setup
You use it to create new Droplets quickly.
Instead of:
apt install ...
pip install ...
git clone ...
docker pull ...
you boot from a prepared image and everything is already there.
Why people use Droplets directly
Most people only need:
- 1 machine
- temporary testing
- experimentation
- simple workloads
So they just:
- Create a Droplet
- Configure it manually
- Use it
- Destroy it later
This is simpler and cheaper initially.
Especially for:
- hobby users
- students
- researchers
- short GPU sessions
On AMD Developer Cloud, many users:
- spin up MI300X
- test ROCm
- benchmark
- then terminate
No need for reusable images.
Why people use Custom Images
Custom Images become useful when setup is expensive or repeated.
Common reasons
1. Fast scaling
Suppose you spent:
- 2 days configuring ROCm
- optimized PyTorch
- inference stack
- monitoring
- datasets
You don’t want to redo this every time.
So you create a custom image and instantly clone new machines.
This is common in:
- AI startups
- MLOps
- distributed inference
- Kubernetes worker pools
2. Consistency
Without images:
- one server has CUDA 12.1
- another has CUDA 12.4
- different Python libs
- different bugs
Custom images ensure:
- identical environment
- reproducible deployments
- fewer “works on my machine” problems
Very important in enterprises and banks like HSBC.
3. Disaster recovery
If a server dies:
- recreate from image in minutes
Instead of rebuilding manually.
This matters for:
- production services
- GPU clusters
- CI/CD infrastructure
4. Cost optimization for time
Images cost storage money:
- $0.06/GiB/month in DigitalOcean
But engineers are expensive.
Example:
- 100 GB image = ~$6/month
- rebuilding environment manually may take 4–8 hours
So companies gladly pay storage cost.
Why people avoid Custom Images
1. Storage costs
Large AI images become huge.
Typical ML image:
- Ubuntu
- ROCm/CUDA
- Docker
- Models
- Conda caches
Can easily become:
- 50 GB
- 100 GB
- 300 GB+
That becomes expensive across many snapshots.
2. Images become stale
You save an image today:
- packages outdated next month
- security patches missing
- old drivers
- incompatible libraries
Then maintaining images becomes operational work.
3. Infrastructure-as-Code became popular
Modern DevOps often prefers:
- Docker
- Terraform
- Ansible
- Kubernetes
- cloud-init
Instead of huge VM snapshots.
Reason:
- text configs are version-controlled
- easier to audit
- easier to reproduce
So many advanced teams now use:
- small base image
- automated provisioning scripts
instead of giant custom images.
In AI/GPU workloads
Custom images are especially valuable because setup is painful.
Example on AMD MI300X:
- ROCm version compatibility
- PyTorch build
- kernel modules
- Flash Attention
- vLLM
- model cache
can take hours.
So AI engineers often:
- Configure one perfect GPU VM
- Snapshot it
- Reuse everywhere
This is extremely common.
Simple analogy
| Concept | Real-world analogy |
|---|---|
| Droplet | Running computer |
| Custom Image | Backup disk / machine template |
| Snapshot | Saved restore point |
| Docker Image | App-level template |
| Kubernetes | Large-scale orchestration |
Your observation about AMD Developer Cloud quota is related
You noticed AMD limits users to small GPU quotas.
That changes behavior:
- users often treat GPU instances as temporary
- less need for persistent infrastructure
- more “ephemeral experimentation”
So users:
- create Droplet
- test
- destroy
rather than building large image pipelines.
But startups or advanced users often still create reusable images because GPU environment setup is expensive and fragile.
References:
- https://www.digitalocean.com/products/droplets
- https://docs.digitalocean.com/products/images/custom-images/
- https://www.amd.com/en/developer/resources/cloud-access.html