Eight Names with Group and Capital Caps | Generated by AI
The instrument list now has 8 names:
| Symbol | Name | Strategy | Period | Group |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAPL | Apple | mean_reversion | DAY | risk_on |
| INTC | Intel | mean_reversion | DAY | risk_on |
| AVGO | Broadcom | mean_reversion | DAY | risk_on |
| GOOGL | Alphabet | mean_reversion | DAY | risk_on |
| PDD | PDD Holdings | mean_reversion | DAY | china |
| NVDA | Nvidia | momentum_breakout | ONE_HOUR | risk_on |
| GLD | Gold | trend_following | FOUR_HOURS | commodity |
| USO | Crude Oil | trend_following | FOUR_HOURS | commodity |
Two things worth flagging:
-
Group cap interaction.
risk_onnow holds 5 names (AAPL, INTC, AVGO, GOOGL, NVDA) butMAX_GROUP_POSITIONS = 2, so the bot will hold at most 2 risk_on positions at once — the correlation filter will skip the rest. That’s by design (avoids piling into correlated big-tech), but with 5 candidates competing for 2 slots, any individual name trades less often. PDD in its ownchinagroup gets a dedicated slot. If you’d rather give big-tech more room, bumpMAX_GROUP_POSITIONSto 3. -
Capital. On a ~$2k account,
entry_quantityis also capped by free cash (AVAILABLE_FUNDS_BUFFER), so realistically only a couple of these can be funded at a time anyway — the group cap rarely becomes the binding constraint.
Both edits (daily timeframes + 3 new symbols) are still uncommitted. Want me to commit them together, and push so the next scheduled run picks them up?