Command iostat and System Metrics Analysis | Generated by AI

Home 2025.06 English 中文 日本語 Español हिंदी Français Deutsch العربية 繁體中文

---

The iostat -x command output provides detailed I/O (input/output) statistics for your system’s CPU and disk devices. Here’s a breakdown of what the output means:

CPU Statistics

The avg-cpu section shows CPU utilization:

• %user: 0.38% of CPU time is spent on user processes.
• %nice: 0.00% on processes with modified priority (nice).
• %system: 0.12% on system (kernel) processes.
• %iowait: 0.01% of CPU time waiting for I/O operations to complete (very low, indicating minimal I/O bottlenecks).
• %steal: 0.00% (relevant in virtualized environments, indicates CPU time stolen by the hypervisor).
• %idle: 99.48% of CPU time is idle, meaning the system is mostly not under heavy load.

Interpretation: Your CPU is barely utilized, with nearly all time spent idle. This suggests the system is not under significant computational or I/O stress.

Device Statistics

The Device section lists I/O activity for each block device (e.g., loop0, nvme0n1, sda). Here’s what the columns mean:

1. Device: The block device name (e.g., loop0 to loop38 are likely loop devices for snap packages; nvme0n1 is an NVMe SSD; sda is likely a traditional HDD or SSD).
2. r/s: Reads per second.
3. rkB/s: Read kilobytes per second.
4. rrqm/s: Read requests merged per second (queued reads combined into a single request).
5. %rrqm: Percentage of read requests merged.
6. r_await: Average time (ms) for read requests to be served.
7. rareq-sz: Average size (kB) of read requests.
8. w/s: Writes per second.
9. wkB/s: Write kilobytes per second.
10. wrqm/s: Write requests merged per second.
11. %wrqm: Percentage of write requests merged.
12. w_await: Average time (ms) for write requests to be served.
13. wareq-sz: Average size (kB) of write requests.
14. d/s: Discards per second (for SSDs with TRIM support).
15. dkB/s: Discarded kilobytes per second.
16. drqm/s: Discard requests merged per second.
17. %drqm: Percentage of discard requests merged.
18. d_await: Average time (ms) for discard requests.
19. dareq-sz: Average size (kB) of discard requests.
20. f/s: Flush requests per second.
21. f_await: Average time (ms) for flush requests.
22. aqu-sz: Average queue size (number of requests waiting).
23. %util: Percentage of device utilization (how busy the device is).

Key Observations

• Loop Devices (loop0 to loop38):
  • These are likely associated with snap packages (common in Ubuntu).
  • Most show very low activity (e.g., r/s and rkB/s near 0), with minimal reads and no writes or discards.
  • Some devices (e.g., loop15, loop33, loop4) have slightly higher read rates (e.g., 4.32 kB/s, 7.11 kB/s, 5.82 kB/s), but still negligible.
  • r_await varies (e.g., 0.04ms for loop19 to 1.83ms for loop21), indicating minor latency differences.
  • Utilization (%util) is 0.00% for all loop devices, meaning they’re not heavily used.
• nvme0n1 (NVMe SSD):
  • Significant activity compared to others:
    • Reads: 7.46 reads/s, 617.52 kB/s.
    • Writes: 3.56 writes/s, 107.86 kB/s.
    • Read latency (r_await): 0.30ms (very fast).
    • Write latency (w_await): 3.02ms (slightly higher but still good for an SSD).
    • Request sizes: 82.73 kB for reads, 30.30 kB for writes.
    • Merging: 15.06% of reads and 49.38% of writes are merged, indicating some I/O optimization.
    • Utilization: 0.24%, still very low, meaning the SSD is not under heavy load.
• sda (HDD or SSD):
  • Minimal activity: 0.00 reads/s, 0.10 kB/s, no writes or discards.
  • Very low utilization (0.00%), suggesting it’s barely used.

Overall Interpretation

• System Load: The system is under very light load, with 99.48% CPU idle and minimal I/O activity across most devices.
• I/O Activity: The NVMe SSD (nvme0n1) handles the majority of I/O, with moderate read/write activity but low latency and utilization, indicating good performance. Loop devices and sda have negligible activity, likely because they’re used for background tasks or rarely accessed storage.
• Performance: No bottlenecks are evident. The low %iowait (0.01%) and low device utilization (%util) suggest the system is handling I/O efficiently.
• Potential Actions:
  • If you’re troubleshooting performance, this output suggests I/O is not a problem. Look elsewhere (e.g., CPU-bound processes, memory, or application issues).
  • If monitoring, the system is healthy with plenty of I/O capacity.

Would you like a chart to visualize the read/write rates of key devices (e.g., nvme0n1, sda, and a few loop devices)? Or do you have a specific aspect you’d like to dive deeper into?

---

Back Donate