Strategies for Training Large Language Models | Generated by AI
Question: How should I approach training a GPT-3-scale model — thinking about data collection strategy, how much data is really needed, and what’s the most cost-effective way to accumulate 10TB+ without paying for expensive external bandwidth?
Answer:
Great thinking, and you’re on the right track! Let me break this down clearly across three areas: how much data you actually need, where to get it without crazy bandwidth costs, and the practical strategy.
1. How Much Data Does a GPT-3-Scale Model Actually Need?
First, let’s calibrate expectations with real numbers:
GPT-3’s training corpus started at 45TB of compressed plaintext (roughly 90TB uncompressed), but after filtering, the actual training mix was around 570GB total — with CommonCrawl contributing about 400GB of that.
So the key insight is: raw data volume ≠ effective training data volume. Massive raw dumps get filtered down dramatically.
For reference: GPT-2 was trained on ~40GB of text, GPT-3 on approximately 500 trillion tokens, and Phi-3 on 3 trillion tokens. A solid order of magnitude target for a serious personal experiment is around 1 trillion tokens.
For your current 60GB experiment — that’s actually close to GPT-2 scale territory, which is a reasonable start. Jumping to 10TB of raw data is not unreasonable for GPT-3-class ambitions, but you need to account for heavy filtering reducing it significantly.
2. Data Quality > Raw Size
A smaller model trained on high-quality open source data can outperform a larger model trained on noisy, poorly curated datasets. The preprocessing pipeline — deduplication, URL filtering, tokenization, contamination detection — often matters more than architectural innovations.
Key ready-made datasets you should look at instead of raw-crawling everything:
- FineWeb-edu — 1.5 trillion tokens, 9TB compressed — a high-quality educative subset with a great quality-to-size ratio, hosted on Hugging Face (
HuggingFaceFW/fineweb-edu). - The Pile — 800GB, curated, widely used
- RedPajama — 1.2T tokens
- RefinedWeb — 5T+ tokens
These are pre-filtered and deduplicated, saving you enormous preprocessing work.
3. How to Get 10TB Without Expensive Bandwidth
You’re right to think carefully about this. Here are the real strategies:
Option A: Use Pre-existing Open Datasets (Best ROI)
Common Crawl comprises petabytes of raw web data released monthly. GPT-3, LLaMA, OpenLLaMA, and T5 all used it in pre-training. You can download specific monthly snapshots directly from commoncrawl.org — they offer free S3 access via AWS, which is the cheapest path.
Option B: Hugging Face datasets Library Streaming
You don’t need to download 10TB all at once. Use Hugging Face’s streaming API — process data on-the-fly without storing everything locally. This avoids the bandwidth problem entirely for training purposes.
from datasets import load_dataset
ds = load_dataset("HuggingFaceFW/fineweb-edu", streaming=True, split="train")
Option C: VPS / Server with Unlimited Internal Bandwidth (Your DMIT approach)
Your instinct about DMIT is solid for bulk downloading:
- Use a VPS with unlimited or high-quota internal bandwidth to download datasets from Hugging Face / Common Crawl S3
- Then transfer to your local machine via local network / hard drive copy (no external quota burned)
- For 10TB at ~$10/TB used HDD cost, you’re looking at ~$100 in storage hardware
Used HDDs can be found at around €10/TB on eBay or Amazon — just be cautious about “0-hour usage” claims from resellers, and factor in that some drives may fail in transit.
Option D: Ask Friends / Research Groups for Direct Drive Copy
100% valid. Academic labs and ML communities often share drives directly for exactly this reason. The ML community around Hugging Face is very collaborative about this.
4. The Practical Roadmap
| Step | Action |
|---|---|
| Now (60GB) | Finish GPT-2 scale experiment, run benchmarks (even simple ones like perplexity on held-out set) |
| Next (500GB–1TB) | Download FineWeb-edu subset, clean it, tokenize with BPE |
| Later (10TB+) | Use VPS to batch-download Common Crawl snapshots, copy to local drives |
| Training | Use Chinchilla scaling laws to match data size to model parameter count |
Scaling laws show that parameter count and dataset size should be scaled proportionally for optimal performance — a 70B model trained on insufficient data underperforms a 7B model trained on properly scaled, high-quality data.
The most important thing right now: run benchmarks on your 60GB GPT-2 experiment first before scaling. Even simple perplexity measurements or few-shot task evaluations will tell you if your pipeline is working before you invest in 10TB of data collection.
References:
- LLMs Explained Part 2: Data Collection
- Open-Sourced Training Datasets for LLMs - Kili Technology
- LLM Training Datasets - glennklockwood.com
- Foundational LLM Pre-training at Home - Medium
- LLMDataHub - GitHub
- FineWeb-edu on Hugging Face