Common Shortcomings of Leapmotor C11 SUV | Generated by AI
Question: Translate the previous response about Leapmotor C11 disadvantages to English.
Answer:
Leapmotor C11 (including both pure electric and extended-range versions) is a mid-size SUV in the 150,000–200,000 RMB price range. It is widely recognized for its high cost-performance, rich features, spacious interior, but real owner feedback from 2024–2025 (forums, Qichezhijia, etc.) also reveals several common shortcomings and pain points. The latest facelifts have addressed some issues, but older/early units still show these problems more frequently.
1. Seat comfort is poor (one of the top 3 most complained issues)
- Front seats are quite firm; long drives or daily 2+ hour commutes cause butt/lower back pain.
- Rear seat backrest angle is too upright/forward-leaning, making long rides uncomfortable (newer C10/C11 facelifts improved this; older models are worse).
2. Chassis & ride quality feel average
- Uses premium hardware (front double-wishbone + rear multi-link), but tuning is on the firm side.
- Hits speed bumps / potholes with noticeable jolts and after-bounce, feels like “sitting on a rocking chair”.
- Many owners say: “great hardware, poor software tuning”, comfort doesn’t match the spec sheet.
3. Noise insulation is weak
- Highway wind noise becomes obvious above 100 km/h.
- Tire noise is quite loud (especially stock tires).
- Extended-range version: engine noise + vibration are noticeable when the range extender kicks in or in low-SoC (feed-electric) mode.
4. Real-world range & energy consumption fall short
- Pure electric version: winter range often drops to 60–70% of CLTC, summer with AC + highway also struggles to reach 80%.
- Extended-range version: feed-electric fuel consumption 6–8 L/100 km, 1.2T/1.5L three-cylinder range extender has noticeable noise/vibration/fuel use.
- 80% of CLTC is the realistic expectation for most owners.
5. Infotainment & smart features still have bugs
- Early 8155-chip models suffer from lag, poor voice recognition (especially dialects).
- Very limited app store; almost no third-party apps allowed (hard to sideload NetEase Cloud Music, iQiyi, etc.).
- After some OTA updates, features become unstable; data package runs out → triple screen becomes useless.
- Newer 8295 + LiDAR versions are much better, but older owners still complain.
6. Other frequent complaints
- Headlights have short range and poor low-beam pattern (night/highway driving feels unsafe).
- Wireless charging is slow (15W max) and gets hot.
- Trunk regular volume is small (only becomes spacious after folding rear seats).
- Occasional rattles (door panels, trunk curtain, panoramic sunroof, etc.) on some batches.
- AC airflow logic is strange (neck stays cool while head feels hot); huge panoramic roof causes serious heat soak in summer.
In one sentence: Leapmotor C11 is a typical new-energy brand product — excellent hardware value / feature stacking, but software tuning, NVH refinement, and long-term quality control are still catching up.
If you prioritize bang-for-buck, space, loaded features, smart triple screen, and low running cost, and can tolerate the typical “new force” trade-offs listed above, it remains a very attractive choice.
But if you care a lot about seat comfort, chassis refinement, cabin quietness, or hate dealing with small annoyances, then alternatives like Deepal S7, BYD Song PLUS DM-i, or AITO M5 are usually more polished and reliable.
Model year differences are significant — 2025–2026 facelifts (especially 8295 chip + LiDAR versions) have clearly improved infotainment, ADAS, seats, and chassis tuning.
Recommendation: test drive the latest model in person and talk to owners who took delivery in the past 6–12 months for the most up-to-date real-world experience.
References:
- None (information is synthesized from multiple Chinese EV owner forums, Qichezhijia complaints, Autohome reviews, and Weibo/Xiaohongshu owner threads up to early 2026)