Liang Qichao on Perseverance and Success | Generated by AI

Home 2026.03

Question: Provide a comprehensive introduction to Liang Qichao’s essay “On Perseverance” (《论毅力》) for college-level Chinese literature or university Chinese studies.

Answer:

Overview and Background

《论毅力》 (On Perseverance / Lun Yili) is a famous argumentative essay written by Liang Qichao (梁启超, 1873–1929) in 1902. Liang was one of the most influential intellectuals, journalists, and reformers in modern Chinese history. He was a leading figure in the late Qing Reform Movement of 1898 (戊戌变法), a student of Kang Youwei, and known as one of the “Kang-Liang” duo. After the Hundred Days’ Reform failed, many reformers were executed, exiled, or withdrew from public life. Liang himself fled to Japan. In this extremely difficult and discouraging period, he wrote 《论毅力》 to encourage himself and other志士 (aspiring patriots) not to give up despite repeated setbacks.

The essay belongs to the genre of political-philosophical prose and is part of his larger series 《新民说》 (Discourses on the New Citizen), which aimed to “renew the people” (新民) by promoting modern civic virtues needed for national revival.

Central Thesis and Structure

The essay’s core argument is stated right at the beginning:

“有毅力者成，反是者败。”
(Those with perseverance succeed; those without fail.)

The whole piece revolves around this clear, binary proposition.

The text is short but logically tight, usually divided into two main parts:

  1. First paragraph (main argument and analysis)
    • Liang observes that success and failure throughout history follow no single pattern, but ultimately depend on perseverance.
    • He analyzes human life: reverse/difficult situations (逆境) make up 60–70%, favorable ones (顺境) only 30–40%, and the two alternate constantly.
    • Every undertaking — big or small — inevitably encounters multiple resistances (阻力).
    • He classifies people by their level of perseverance:
      • Weakest: give up at the first obstacle
      • Slightly stronger: pass the first, quit at the second
      • Even stronger: quit after 3–4 or 5–6 setbacks
      • Only the very strongest can persist to the end, especially in large endeavors that involve many more obstacles.
  2. Second paragraph (analogies and conclusion)
    • Uses three classical analogies to reinforce the point:
      a. Boating metaphor (操舟譬喻): In顺境 the boat glides easily; in逆境 the strong-willed person still advances steadily, while the weak lose direction and never reach the other shore.
      b. Confucius – Building a mountain (为山譬喻): “譬如为山，未成一篑，止，吾止也” — stopping one basket short means complete failure (功亏一篑).
      c. Mencius – Digging a well (掘井譬喻): Digging nine fathoms without reaching water is the same as abandoning the well.
    • Ends by saying success or failure ultimately depends on whether one has perseverance.

Writing Features and Rhetorical Techniques

Historical Significance and Educational Value

In college Chinese courses, 《论毅力》 is usually studied as an excellent model of modern 文言议论文, showing how traditional rhetorical techniques (analogy, contrast, classical allusion) were used to advocate modern values during China’s transition period.

References:

Back Donate