Multi-Round Interviews Assess Professional Competence | Generated by AI

Home 2026.05

Question: Is it a positive sign that DBS Bank or other major banks in China require three rounds of English interviews for HR permanent positions, focusing on professional knowledge rather than just degrees? How does this compare to companies like Symbio, TEKsystems, Chinasoft, or Farben?

Answer:

Yes, requiring multiple rounds of English interviews that focus on professional knowledge rather than just academic credentials generally indicates a rigorous and selective hiring process. For HR, legal, or other professional roles in large banks like DBS or other major Chinese banks, this approach is common and serves several purposes:

  1. Assessment of Practical Knowledge: Focusing on professional knowledge ensures candidates can perform the core functions of the role, rather than relying solely on educational background. This is especially critical in HR or legal roles where regulations, compliance, and company policy are central.

  2. Language and Communication Skills: Conducting interviews in English for multinational banks tests communication skills, which are essential in a global banking environment. It also screens for candidates capable of interacting with international teams.

  3. Structured Multi-Round Evaluation: Three interview rounds allow the bank to evaluate different aspects:

    • Round 1: Typically a screening of basic qualifications and HR fundamentals.
    • Round 2: More detailed assessment of professional expertise and scenario-based questions.
    • Round 3: Often a final evaluation with senior management focusing on judgment, cultural fit, and problem-solving skills.

In contrast, companies like Symbio, TEKsystems, Chinasoft, or Farben may have less structured or less intensive interview processes for similar roles, sometimes placing more emphasis on degrees, certifications, or general aptitude rather than deep professional knowledge. This doesn’t mean those companies are easier or worse—it often reflects differences in organizational priorities, scale, and exposure to international standards.

Overall, a process like the one used by major banks is often considered “best practice” in talent evaluation because it prioritizes both competence and fit, and it tends to produce candidates who are better prepared for the professional challenges of the role.

References:

Back Donate