NYTimes News (CN) Articles

NYTimes News (CN) Articles | Generated by AI

Home PDF

Nuclear Temptation: The Warning to Non-Nuclear States from the U.S. Bombing of Iran’s Nuclear Facilities

The article discusses the potential implications of the U.S. bombing of Iranian nuclear facilities on global nuclear proliferation. The attack, ordered by President Trump, aimed to prevent Iran from joining the club of nuclear-armed nations. However, it has raised fears that Iran and other countries might conclude that possessing nuclear weapons is the only defense in a threatening world. North Korea, the last country to acquire nuclear weapons, has not faced such an attack and is now viewed as largely impregnable. Trump’s actions have also stirred concerns among U.S. allies in the Middle East and Asia, who are questioning the reliability of the U.S. nuclear umbrella. The article highlights the increasing support for nuclear development in countries like South Korea and Japan, and the potential for a regional arms race. Despite these concerns, experts note that nonproliferation policies have been successful in preventing a full-blown arms race. The article also references historical examples, such as Libya’s decision to give up its nuclear weapons and the subsequent consequences, as cautionary tales. The long-term impact of the U.S. strikes on Iran’s nuclear ambitions and the broader geopolitical landscape remains uncertain.

U.S. Strike on Iran or Impact on Beijing’s Taiwan Strategy Considerations

President Trump’s decision to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities, despite his earlier stance against U.S. involvement in foreign wars, has added complexity for China’s leaders in assessing how he might handle potential conflicts over Taiwan. Chinese officials and experts are now evaluating Trump’s actions to gain insights into his approach, especially given his previous opposition to military action and subsequent aggressive moves against Iran.

China views Trump as an unpredictable factor in scenarios involving U.S. responses to Beijing’s efforts to assert control over Taiwan, including potential military actions. The U.S. has traditionally supported Taiwan through arms sales and the option of military intervention if necessary. Some Chinese analysts speculate that Trump might be persuaded to ease U.S. support for Taiwan through diplomatic pressure or warnings, given his mercurial style and past actions, such as backing down in the trade war with China.

The Iran strikes have heightened Chinese leaders’ caution about testing Trump’s resolve on Taiwan. Experts like Zack Cooper from the American Enterprise Institute suggest that China will be more hesitant to provoke Trump due to his demonstrated willingness to use force and his unpredictable behavior.

China has been actively probing Trump’s red lines on Taiwan, with some researchers meeting American counterparts to assess his potential responses. China’s military activities around Taiwan, including frequent aircraft deployments and naval exercises, are part of this probing strategy. Beijing aims to be prepared for various scenarios, including rapid escalation or loss of control, under Trump’s administration.

Trump’s administration has signaled support for Taiwan while urging increased military spending. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth warned of an imminent Chinese military threat but also emphasized that Trump makes the final decisions. This unpredictability worries some in Washington and Taipei, who fear Beijing might persuade Trump to dilute U.S. support for Taiwan.

Some experts in Taiwan see Trump’s strike on Iran as a message to Beijing, while others note that Trump, like recent U.S. presidents, has been deliberately vague about U.S. intervention in a potential Chinese attack on Taiwan. Trump has also questioned the effectiveness of U.S. intervention against China’s forces, which are closer to Taiwan.

China’s leaders are prepared for a potential crisis over Taiwan and are confident in their military capabilities, which include a large number of missiles, a growing nuclear arsenal, and a rapidly expanding navy. Experts like Stacie Pettyjohn from the Center for a New American Security suggest that a conflict over Taiwan would be complex and not easily resolved through limited strikes.

Rubio Rejects Intelligence Report, Insists U.S. Has Destroyed Iran’s Nuclear Ambitions

President Trump and Secretary of State Marco Rubio asserted at a NATO summit that the U.S. attack on Iran had dealt a fatal blow to its nuclear ambitions, contradicting a U.S. intelligence report and more cautious assessments from international nuclear inspectors. Rubio detailed how the destruction of a key “conversion facility” had set back Iran’s nuclear progress by years. The summit focused on Iran’s potential recovery from the strike, overshadowing Trump’s achievement of securing increased defense spending from NATO allies. Trump criticized media outlets for questioning the attack’s effectiveness and announced upcoming U.S.-Iran talks. Iran threatened to stop cooperating with international inspectors, complicating assessments of the damage. Trump downplayed the importance of a diplomatic agreement with Iran, expressing confidence that Iran would not pursue nuclear weapons. Despite initial indications from Iranian officials about re-engaging in diplomacy, Trump remained focused on proving the destruction of Iran’s nuclear sites. Administration officials denied that Iran had moved its stockpile of near-bomb-grade fuel, while independent analysts and international officials suggested otherwise.

Trump Attends NATO Summit, Positions Himself as Global Peace Maker

During his brief visit to the NATO summit, President Trump aimed to portray himself as a global peacemaker. He highlighted his role in negotiating a cease-fire between Israel and Iran, increasing NATO military spending, and his desire for the Nobel Peace Prize. Trump expressed frustration over not ending the Russia-Ukraine war, blaming both Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelensky. He also mentioned his efforts in brokering peace between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of Congo, and between India and Pakistan. Despite his claims, NATO leaders did not address pressing issues like a new Russia strategy or China, focusing instead on Trump’s defense spending pledge. Trump’s visit was marked by his desire for public recognition and his tendency to lose interest in long-term diplomatic efforts.

Seeing America’s Future from China’s Surveillance Cameras

The article discusses the pervasive surveillance in China and its potential implications for the United States. The author, Megan K. Stack, describes her observations during a trip to China, where she noticed an extensive surveillance system with cameras everywhere, leading to a sense of public safety but also a feeling of being constantly monitored. This surveillance is part of a broader system that includes predictive algorithms used to control dissent and manage public health during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The article highlights how China’s surveillance technology could be a glimpse into America’s future, given the current trajectory of technological advancements and data collection in the U.S. The author notes that while the U.S. has different political structures and legal protections, recent events have shown that privacy rights can be eroded. The Trump administration’s actions, such as the DOGE data grab and the use of Palantir technology, are cited as examples of how data can be misused.

The article also discusses the integration of personal data by companies like Palantir and the potential for abuse, especially in the context of immigration enforcement and social media monitoring. The author warns that the consolidation of data by the government could lead to significant abuses, and that the public is often unaware of how their data is being used.

The article concludes by emphasizing the need for vigilance and action to protect privacy rights, as the current trend towards surveillance and data collection could lead to a future where privacy is severely compromised.

Attack on Iran: Risks to the United States and the World

President Trump claimed a “spectacular military success” in destroying three sites in Iran, but the legality and effectiveness of the strikes remain uncertain. The article highlights three key risks and unknowns:

Iran’s Retaliation: Iran has multiple options for retaliation, including attacks on U.S. bases, cyberattacks, and disrupting oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz. The severity and nature of Iran’s response are uncertain, but it is expected to be significant.
Impact on Iran’s Nuclear Program: The strikes may have either halted or accelerated Iran’s nuclear efforts. The effectiveness of the bombings, particularly on the Fordo enrichment site, is unclear. There is a risk that the attacks could push Iran to accelerate its nuclear weapons program.
Future of the Conflict: The strikes could either end or escalate the conflict. Optimists believe the strikes could end Iran’s nuclear program and regime, but historical examples, like the Iraq war, suggest otherwise. The future remains highly uncertain, with potential for both positive and alarming outcomes.

The article concludes that while Trump’s speech was triumphant, it is too early to celebrate due to the significant uncertainties and risks involved.

Report: US Did Not Destroy Iran’s Nuclear Facilities, Only Set Back Program by Months

A preliminary U.S. report indicates that the American bombing of three nuclear sites in Iran set back the country’s nuclear program by only a few months. The strikes sealed off the entrances to two facilities but did not collapse their underground buildings. Before the attack, U.S. intelligence agencies estimated that Iran could rush to make a bomb in about three months. Post-strike, the Defense Intelligence Agency estimated the program was delayed by less than six months. Much of Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile was moved before the strikes, and some may have been relocated to secret locations. Some Israeli officials believe Iran maintained covert enrichment facilities to continue its nuclear program in case of an attack. The three sites—Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan—suffered moderate to severe damage, with Natanz being the most affected. It is unclear if Iran will attempt to rebuild these programs. If Iran tries to quickly develop a bomb, it would likely be a small and crude device. The report suggests that the sites were not damaged as much as some officials had hoped, and Iran retains control of almost all of its nuclear material. The White House disputed the report’s findings, claiming the strikes were successful. The initial damage assessment indicates that President Trump’s claim that Iran’s nuclear facilities were “obliterated” was overstated.

China Strengthens Control Over Fentanyl, But Reiterates That the Fentanyl Crisis Originates in the United States

China has intensified controls on two chemicals used to produce fentanyl, a powerful synthetic opioid, as part of its efforts to address the fentanyl issue, which is intertwined with broader trade disputes with the United States. The Trump administration has accused China of not doing enough to prevent fentanyl from entering the U.S., where it causes tens of thousands of deaths annually. In response, the U.S. imposed 20% tariffs on Chinese goods earlier this year.

China’s recent move to control 4-piperidone and 1-Boc-4-piperidone, which are precursor chemicals for fentanyl, was seen as a gesture of cooperation. This decision was announced after a meeting between China’s public security minister and the U.S. ambassador to China. However, China maintains that the root cause of the fentanyl crisis lies in the U.S., citing the abuse of prescription painkillers and ineffective regulation.

Despite some easing of tariffs on Chinese goods, the U.S. continues to impose tariffs related to fentanyl. Recent tensions over mineral exports threatened to disrupt the trade détente, but President Trump and Chinese leader Xi Jinping agreed to revive trade talks. The possibility of a meeting between the two leaders, either in China or at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Seoul, is being discussed. Progress on trade disputes and issues like fentanyl will influence these diplomatic efforts.

U.S. Attack on Iran Damages Its Own Credibility

China criticized the U.S. for attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities during negotiations, asserting that this action damaged America’s credibility as a global power and a reliable negotiator. China’s UN ambassador, Fu Cong, stated that while Iran was harmed, so was the U.S.’s reputation. China, along with Russia and Pakistan, is drafting a UN resolution calling for a cease-fire and peace negotiations. Chinese state media echoed these criticisms, accusing the U.S. of escalating violence in the Middle East and destabilizing the region. Despite China’s public stance, it remains a significant backer of Iran, both diplomatically and economically, and its influence over Iran could be crucial as tensions rise. China has been cautious about its response to potential Iranian actions, such as closing the Strait of Hormuz, and has avoided direct engagement with the U.S. on the issue.

Korean Wave Endures, Is South Korea Becoming a Cultural Superpower?

South Korean culture, known as “Hallyu,” has seen a resurgence in global popularity. Recent achievements include the Tony Award-winning musical “Maybe Happy Ending,” the Oscar-winning film “Parasite,” and the Nobel Prize in Literature awarded to Han Kang. In the K-pop scene, BTS’s completion of mandatory national service has fans hoping for a reunion, while Blackpink is set to embark on a global tour. The third season of “Squid Game” is also highly anticipated on Netflix.

The Korean Wave, which began in the late 1990s with the popularity of Korean soaps in China and Japan, has been further amplified by the internet. Psy’s “Gangnam Style” and BTS’s global success have significantly boosted K-pop’s international presence. The Busan Film Festival and director Park Chan-wook’s Cannes Grand Prix win for “Oldboy” have also contributed to South Korea’s cultural influence.

Despite its success, South Korea faces geopolitical challenges, such as China’s unofficial ban on K-pop performances and North Korea’s restrictions on South Korean media. Experts debate whether K-culture has reached its peak or will have lasting global influence. K-pop and K-dramas have sparked interest in other aspects of South Korean culture, including K-beauty and K-food.

Korean cosmetic exports have surged, with South Korea becoming the third-largest exporter of makeup. K-food, such as kimbap and bibimbap, is also gaining global popularity, with viral videos and Netflix shows like “Culinary Class Wars” contributing to its rise. The increasing interest in South Korea has led to a rise in tourists, foreign residents, and exchange students, though some immigrants report experiencing discrimination.

Overall, while South Korea’s cultural influence is significant, it still has a way to go to match the global impact of countries like the United States, France, Italy, and Japan.

Trump Administration Hands Global Discourse to China, Russia and Other Rivals

The Trump administration’s dismantling of U.S. global influence and information infrastructure, including media outlets like Voice of America, has been celebrated by rivals such as China and Russia. These countries have moved to fill the void left by the U.S., increasing their investments in global media and cultural exports. Experts warn that the U.S. is relinquishing its global influence and neglecting defenses against damaging narratives and disinformation. The White House has not responded to requests for comment. The U.S. has historically used soft power, including media and cultural exports, to project its influence globally. However, recent actions by the Trump administration, such as shutting down a foreign influence task force and closing a State Department office that countered global disinformation, have weakened these efforts. The administration has focused more on economic pressure and military force. Global powers like China, Russia, and Turkey have expanded their media presence, with China increasing its U.S. distribution budget and Turkey’s TRT broadcaster starting a channel in Somalia. China’s propaganda efforts have had mixed success but are increasingly leveraging social media influencers and private entrepreneurs. The U.S. has seen a decline in global trust, with the European Union and Japan now ranking higher in Southeast Asia. The EU has provided emergency support to Radio Free Europe, and the UK is creating a soft-power council. There are signs that the Trump administration may be reconsidering its approach, as Voice of America workers were called back to cover the conflict between Israel and Iran.

Seven Tips to Help You Survive the Scorching Summer

A dangerous heat wave is affecting much of the central and eastern United States, with temperatures reaching triple digits and impacting nearly 100 million Americans. Extreme heat can affect almost every part of the body, not just causing heat stroke but also impacting brain function, cardiovascular health, and more. Key points to stay safe include:

Brain Fog: High temperatures can slow down brain function, affecting reaction time, attention, and memory. It can also increase irritability and aggression.
Staying Cool: Without air-conditioning, use strategies like closing shades, immersing feet in cold water, and using damp towels with ice. Fans can help, but ensure windows are open. Carry an umbrella, water bottle with ice, and a spray bottle for outdoor activities.
Protecting Vulnerable Groups: Older adults and children are particularly vulnerable. Older adults with conditions like cardiovascular disease and diabetes are at higher risk, while children overheat quickly and have difficulty cooling down.
Medication Risks: Certain medications can increase vulnerability to heat, including those for allergies, high blood pressure, and mental illnesses. Consult a doctor before adjusting medication.
Hydration: Drink plenty of water, milk, and coconut water. Eat hydrating foods like raw fruits and vegetables. Avoid alcohol and limit coffee.
Exercise: Be cautious with outdoor exercise. Hydrate before going out, wear breathable clothing, and find shady areas. Listen to your body for signs of overheating.
Sleeping: Keep the bedroom cool, ideally between 65-68 degrees Fahrenheit. Use air-conditioners, fans, cold showers, or spray sheets with cold water to stay cool before bed.

China’s “Fish Farm” Construction in the Yellow Sea Raises Concerns in South Korea

China has installed structures in the Yellow Sea, claiming they are deep-sea fish farms, but South Korea fears they could be used for military purposes. South Korea’s National Assembly condemned these structures as a threat to maritime safety. A report from the Center for Strategic and International Studies supports these concerns, noting that while the platforms are primarily for aquaculture, their dual-use potential is significant given China’s actions in the South China Sea. The structures could collect data valuable for underwater navigation and detection. South Koreans draw parallels between these installations and China’s actions in the South China Sea, where civilian structures were later used for military purposes. The tensions are expected to be a challenge for South Korea’s new President Lee Jae Myung, who aims to improve ties with China while strengthening the alliance with the United States. China insists the structures are for aquaculture, but South Korea remains concerned about potential military uses. Recent incidents, including a standoff between South Korean and Chinese vessels, have heightened tensions. South Korea has proposed countermeasures, including installing its own aquaculture facilities and building a survey ship to monitor Chinese activities.

Israel and Iran Announce Ceasefire

Iran launched 14 missiles at a U.S. military base in Qatar on June 24, 2025, in retaliation for a U.S. attack on Iranian nuclear sites. President Trump acknowledged Iran’s advance warning of the strike, which allowed for no casualties, and called for peace. Israel and Iran later announced a cease-fire after a week of missile exchanges. The limited scale of Iran’s attack raised hopes of avoiding a broader conflict. Trump described Iran’s response as weak and hoped it marked the end of hostilities. The U.S. had previously launched a significant attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, including the use of B-2 stealth bombers and Tomahawk cruise missiles. The Iranian strike came after a series of missile and drone attacks by Israel, which aimed to eliminate Iran’s nuclear program. World leaders, including French President Emmanuel Macron, urged all parties to de-escalate the conflict. Despite the cease-fire, tensions remained high, with Israel continuing to target Iranian government structures.

Obfuscation and Deliberate Misguidance: How Trump Decided to Strike Iran

特朗普在2025年6月24日决定对伊朗发动打击，尽管他公开声称可能需要两周时间来决定是否采取行动。实际上，特朗普已经基本决定对伊朗的核设施进行打击，军事准备也已就绪。他的声明和社交媒体发言被认为是一种误导，旨在为最后一刻的外交努力争取时间，同时也为了掩盖即将发动的攻击。

特朗普的决定受到多种因素影响，包括与以色列的关系、国内政治压力以及他个人的决策风格。他与反干预派的会面和社交媒体上的言论进一步增加了公众对其决策的猜测。军方在计划中也采取了障眼法，如派遣B-2轰炸机进行假动作，以误导伊朗和其他观察者。

最终，特朗普在6月24日下令发动打击，美国战机对伊朗的核设施进行了精确打击，使用了GBU-57炸弹。尽管特朗普声称这次打击摧毁了伊朗的核能力，但美国官员后来承认，伊朗的核设施可能遭受重创，但并未完全摧毁。特朗普的行动在媒体上获得了广泛关注和赞誉，但他也暗示可能会进一步采取行动，包括可能的政权更迭。

China’s Cyber Espionage Against Russia Targets Military Secrets

Since 2022, Chinese hacking groups linked to the government have repeatedly targeted Russian companies and government agencies, seeking military secrets. These activities intensified in May 2022, shortly after Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, and have continued despite public declarations of friendship between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping. One notable incident involved a group known as Sanyo, which impersonated a major Russian engineering firm to gather information on nuclear submarines. China’s interest in Russia’s military experience and technology is driven by a desire to learn from the ongoing conflict in Ukraine, particularly in areas like drone warfare and software.

A classified Russian counterintelligence document obtained by The New York Times reveals that China is seeking Russian defense expertise and technology, viewing Russia as a vulnerable target. This document refers to China as an “enemy,” highlighting the complex nature of the relationship between the two countries. Despite their public alliance against the West, there is a significant level of mutual distrust and reluctance to share battlefield information.

Chinese hacking groups have targeted various sectors in Russia, including aerospace, private security, and defense. They have used tools like Deed RAT, which is widely deployed by Chinese state-sponsored hackers and is considered proprietary. The group Mustang Panda, one of China’s most active hacking groups, has been particularly active in targeting Russian governmental organizations and military officials. The U.S. Justice Department and FBI have also identified Mustang Panda’s malware as a significant threat, infecting thousands of computer systems globally.

Despite agreements in 2009 and 2015 promising not to carry out cyberattacks against each other, the hacking activities have continued, indicating that these agreements were largely symbolic. The war in Ukraine has prompted a spike in these intrusions, with China viewing the conflict as an opportunity to gather intelligence on modern warfare tactics and Western weaponry.

Back 2025.03.14 Donate