Docker vs Kubernetes | Generated by AI

Home PDF

Docker and Kubernetes are complementary technologies in the container ecosystem, but they serve different purposes. Let’s break down their differences and how they relate.


Docker: Containerization Platform

What it does: Docker is a tool for creating, running, and managing individual containers—lightweight, isolated environments that package an application with its dependencies.

Key Features

  1. Container Runtime:
    • Docker uses a runtime (e.g., containerd or runc) to execute containers based on Linux kernel features like namespaces and cgroups.
    • It’s responsible for the lifecycle of a single container: build, start, stop, etc.
  2. Image Management:
    • Docker builds images from a Dockerfile, which define the app, libraries, and configs.
    • Images are stored in registries (e.g., Docker Hub) and run as containers.
  3. Single-Host Focus:
    • Docker excels at managing containers on one machine. You can run multiple containers, but orchestration across multiple hosts isn’t built-in.
  4. CLI-Driven:
    • Commands like docker build, docker run, and docker ps let you interact with containers directly.

Use Case

Limitations


Kubernetes: Container Orchestration System

What it does: Kubernetes (often abbreviated as K8s) is a platform for managing and orchestrating multiple containers across a cluster of machines. It automates deployment, scaling, and operation of containerized apps.

Key Features

  1. Cluster Management:
    • Kubernetes runs on a cluster of nodes (physical or virtual machines). One node is the “control plane” (managing the cluster), and others are “worker nodes” (running containers).
  2. Orchestration:
    • Scheduling: Decides which node runs each container based on resources and constraints.
    • Scaling: Automatically increases or decreases the number of container instances (e.g., based on CPU usage).
    • Self-Healing: Restarts failed containers, reschedules them if a node dies, and ensures the desired state is maintained.
    • Load Balancing: Distributes traffic across multiple container instances.
  3. Abstraction Layer:
    • Uses “Pods” as the smallest unit—a Pod can contain one or more containers (usually one) that share storage and network resources.
    • Managed via declarative YAML files (e.g., defining deployments, services).
  4. Multi-Host Focus:
    • Designed for distributed systems, coordinating containers across many machines.
  5. Ecosystem:
    • Includes features like service discovery, persistent storage, secrets management, and rolling updates.

Use Case

Limitations


Key Differences

| Aspect | Docker | Kubernetes | |———————–|————————————-|————————————-| | Purpose | Container creation and runtime | Container orchestration | | Scope | Single host | Cluster of hosts | | Unit | Container | Pod (group of 1+ containers) | | Scaling | Manual (e.g., docker run multiple times) | Automatic (via replicas) | | Networking | Basic (bridge, host, overlay) | Advanced (services, ingress) | | Self-Healing | None (manual restart) | Built-in (restarts, reschedules) | | Management | CLI or Docker Compose for small setups | YAML configs, kubectl CLI | | Dependencies | Standalone (needs Docker Engine) | Needs a container runtime (e.g., Docker) |


How They Work Together


Analogy


When to Use Which?


Does this clarify the distinction? Let me know if you’d like to explore a specific aspect—like setting up Kubernetes or comparing it to Docker Compose!


Back 2025.03.21 Donate