Rust One-Liner with Shell Chaining | Generated by AI
You’re hitting on a common desire for experienced developers coming from languages like Python, Ruby, or JavaScript, where you often have a single command to execute a script directly. Rust, being a compiled language, has a slightly different workflow by default.
However, you can definitely achieve a “one-liner” feel, especially for simple scripts or exercises, by chaining commands in your shell.
The Direct “One-Liner” (Shell Chaining)
You already have the components: rustc
for compilation and ./
for execution. You can combine them using shell operators:
rustc scripts/rust/example.rs -o test/example && ./test/example
Explanation:
rustc scripts/rust/example.rs -o test/example
: This compiles your Rust file and places the executable attest/example
.&&
: This is a conditional command separator in bash (and most Unix-like shells). The command after&&
will only execute if the command before&&
successfully completes (i.e., returns an exit code of 0).- If
rustc
compiles without errors, it will return 0, and then./test/example
will run. - If
rustc
encounters a compilation error, it will return a non-zero exit code, and./test/example
will not be executed. This is good behavior!
- If
For a More “Script-like” Experience (Cargo)
While the above &&
approach works well for quick tests, for anything beyond trivial single-file scripts, Rust’s cargo
tool is the recommended way to go, and it does provide a Python-like one-liner for running code within a project:
-
Initialize a Cargo Project (if you haven’t already): If your
scripts/rust/example.rs
is just a standalone file, you’d typically start by creating a Cargo project in its parent directory (or a new dedicated directory).# Go to the directory where you want your project (e.g., scripts/rust) cd scripts/rust # Initialize a new Cargo binary project cargo init --bin .
This will create
Cargo.toml
and move yourexample.rs
(if it wasmain.rs
) or adjust theCargo.toml
to point to it (if you renameexample.rs
tomain.rs
withinsrc/
). -
Run with Cargo: Once you have a Cargo project set up, you can compile and run with a single command:
# From your project root (e.g., scripts/rust if you ran cargo init there) cargo run
cargo run
will:- Compile your code (if it hasn’t been compiled or if changes have been made).
- Then, execute the resulting binary.
- By default, the binary is placed in
target/debug/
within your project, but you don’t have to worry about its specific path.
Why Cargo is preferred:
- Dependency Management: If your code ever needs external libraries (crates), Cargo handles fetching, compiling, and linking them automatically. You specify them in
Cargo.toml
. - Standard Project Structure: It encourages a consistent layout (
src/main.rs
,Cargo.toml
), which makes your code easier for others (and future you) to understand. - Testing:
cargo test
runs your unit and integration tests. - Release Builds:
cargo run --release
(orcargo build --release
) compiles with optimizations for production. - No Manual Cleanup: You don’t have to manually delete compiled binaries.
cargo clean
takes care of it.
What about a true “Scripting” approach like Python’s python script.py
?
Rust isn’t designed as an interpreted scripting language. It’s a compiled systems language. So, you won’t get a direct rust script.rs
command that compiles and runs without an explicit compilation step.
However, there are community tools that try to bridge this gap for quick, single-file Rust “scripts” (though they are still compiling under the hood):
cargo-script
: A Cargo subcommand that allows you to run single.rs
files, handling dependencies if specified via comments. You’d typically install it withcargo install cargo-script
. Then you could potentially runcargo script scripts/rust/example.rs
.rust-script
: Another popular tool for running Rust files directly like scripts. Install it viacargo install rust-script
. Then, you can often just make your.rs
file executable (chmod +x example.rs
) and run it:./example.rs
. It handles the compilation and execution in the background.
For your use case of quickly testing example.rs
, the rustc ... && ./...
one-liner is perfectly fine and directly answers your question about chaining the two commands. For any non-trivial development, embracing Cargo will be a more productive and idiomatic Rust experience.