Optimize Images: 1.91:1, 1200x630

Optimize Images: 1.91:1, 1200x630 | Generated by AI

Home 2025.08

For og:image and twitter:image, the optimal size and aspect ratio depend on how these images will be displayed on various platforms, such as social media feeds, link previews, or articles. Here’s a breakdown of the best practices:

General Recommendations

Aspect Ratio: The most commonly recommended aspect ratio for both og:image and twitter:image is 1.91:1 (or approximately 16:9), as it works well across most platforms, including Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and others. However, other ratios like 1:1 (square) or 4:3 can also work depending on the platform and use case.
Minimum Size: A resolution of at least 1200x630 pixels is widely recommended to ensure clarity on high-resolution displays and compatibility across platforms.
File Size: Keep the image file size under 8MB for og:image and 5MB for twitter:image to ensure fast loading and compatibility.

Platform-Specific Guidelines

Open Graph (og:image):
- Used by platforms like Facebook, LinkedIn, and others for link previews.
- Recommended Size: 1200x630 pixels (1.91:1 aspect ratio).
- Minimum Size: 600x315 pixels.
- Aspect Ratios: 1.91:1 is ideal, but 1:1 or 4:3 can work if designed to avoid cropping.
- Notes: Images smaller than 600x315 may not display properly or may appear pixelated. Facebook prioritizes 1.91:1 for optimal rendering in feeds and shared posts.
Twitter (twitter:image):
- Used for Twitter card previews (e.g., summary_large_image card, as specified in your meta tags).
- Recommended Size: 1200x628 pixels (close to 1.91:1).
- Minimum Size: 280x150 pixels (though larger is better for clarity).
- Aspect Ratios: 1.91:1 is preferred for summary_large_image cards. Twitter may crop images that deviate significantly from this ratio.
- Notes: For the summary_large_image card, Twitter displays the image prominently, so a wide aspect ratio like 1.91:1 ensures minimal cropping.

Choosing the Best Aspect Ratio

1.91:1 (1200x630 pixels): Best for most social media platforms, as it balances width and height for link previews. This is the safest choice for both og:image and twitter:image.
1:1 (e.g., 800x800 or 1200x1200 pixels): Works well for platforms like Instagram or when you want a square image that avoids cropping. However, it may not fill the full preview space on Twitter or Facebook.
4:3 (e.g., 1200x900 pixels): Suitable for images that need more vertical space, but some platforms may crop the top or bottom when displaying in feeds.
3:4 (e.g., 900x1200 pixels): Less common for link previews and may be heavily cropped on platforms like Twitter or Facebook, so it’s generally not recommended.

Best Practice for Your Case

Given your meta tags specify og:image and twitter:image for a personal blog, I recommend:

Size: 1200x630 pixels.
Aspect Ratio: 1.91:1.
Why: This size and ratio ensure compatibility and optimal display across major platforms (Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, etc.) without cropping or pixelation. It’s also widely supported for the summary_large_image Twitter card you’re using.

Additional Tips

Image Content: Ensure the image is visually appealing, with key text or elements centered to avoid cropping. Include your blog’s branding, logo, or a relevant visual that represents the content.
File Format: Use JPG or PNG. JPG is better for photographs to reduce file size, while PNG is ideal for graphics with text or transparency.
Testing: Use tools like Facebook’s Sharing Debugger or Twitter’s Card Validator to preview how your images will appear.

If you want to prioritize a single image for both og:image and twitter:image, use 1200x630 pixels (1.91:1) to ensure the best compatibility and visual quality.

References:

Back Donate