Content Maintenance Like Big Tech

Content Maintenance Like Big Tech | Generated by AI

Home 2025.10

Your observation is spot-on! The challenge of merging, deleting, or simplifying existing content (or code) is a classic problem that mirrors legacy system maintenance in big tech. Here’s why it feels so hard—and how you might approach it systematically, borrowing from software engineering and tech operations best practices:

Why Deleting/Merging Feels Harder Than Writing New Posts

Psychological Resistance (Sunk Cost Fallacy)
- You’ve already invested time in writing those 400 posts. Deleting or merging them feels like “wasting” effort, even if it’s the right long-term move.
- Big Tech Parallel: Engineers often hesitate to deprecate old features because “someone might still use it” (even if metrics show otherwise).
Fear of Breaking Things
- Merging posts might disrupt SEO (broken links, changed URLs), internal linking, or reader expectations.
- Big Tech Parallel: Refactoring legacy code risks introducing bugs in dependent systems. Teams often add “safety nets” (feature flags, canary releases) to mitigate this.
Lack of Clear Metrics
- Without data on which posts are valuable (traffic, engagement, conversions), it’s hard to decide what to keep/merge/delete.
- Big Tech Parallel: Legacy systems often lack observability. Teams start by instrumenting metrics before making changes.
No “Ownership” or Process
- Unlike writing (which is creative and individual), merging/deleting requires a systematic approach (like a codebase cleanup).
- Big Tech Parallel: Large companies assign “tech debt” owners or create dedicated teams (e.g., “Site Reliability Engineers” for infrastructure cleanup).
Tooling Gaps
- Most blogging platforms (WordPress, Ghost, etc.) aren’t designed for bulk content operations. You might need custom scripts or plugins.
- Big Tech Parallel: Engineers build internal tools (e.g., Facebook’s “Gatekeeper” for feature flags) to manage complexity.

How to Approach This Like a Big Tech Team

1. Audit Your Content (Like a Codebase Review)

Inventory: List all 400 posts with metadata (word count, publish date, traffic, backlinks, social shares).
- Tools: Google Analytics, Ahrefs/SEMrush (for backlinks), or a simple spreadsheet.
Categorize:
- Evergreen: High-value, timeless content (keep/improve).
- Outdated: Factual errors, old stats (update or merge).
- Thin/Redundant: Short posts that can be combined.
- Low-Value: No traffic, no backlinks (candidate for deletion).
Big Tech Parallel: “Code audits” where teams label components as “deprecated,” “needs refactor,” or “critical.”

2. Define Merge/Delete Rules (Like Deprecation Policies)

Merge if:
- Posts cover the same topic but are fragmented (e.g., “10 Tips for X” + “5 More Tips for X” → “15 Tips for X”).
- Short posts (<300 words) can be sections in a longer guide.
Delete if:
- No traffic in 12+ months + no backlinks.
- Duplicate content (canonicalize to a better version).
- Irrelevant to your current audience/niche.
Big Tech Parallel: API deprecation policies (e.g., “Sunset in 6 months with migration guide”).

3. Automate Where Possible (Like DevOps Pipelines)

Bulk Actions:
- Use plugins (e.g., WordPress’s “Bulk Delete”) or scripts (Python + CMS API) to handle repetitive tasks.
- Redirect deleted URLs (301 redirects) to preserve SEO.
Templates:
- Create a standard format for merged posts (e.g., “Ultimate Guide to [Topic]”).
Big Tech Parallel: CI/CD pipelines that automate testing/deployment.

4. Phase the Changes (Like Gradual Rollouts)

Start Small: Pick 10–20 low-risk posts to merge/delete. Monitor traffic/SEO impact.
Batch Processing: Tackle 50 posts/month to avoid burnout.
Communicate Changes:
- Update internal links.
- Add notes for readers (e.g., “This post is now part of [New Guide]”).
Big Tech Parallel: Canary releases (rolling out changes to a small % of users first).

5. Track Impact (Like Observability in Systems)

Metrics to Watch:
- Organic traffic (Google Search Console).
- Backlinks (Ahrefs).
- User engagement (time on page, bounce rate).
Rollback Plan: If a merge hurts SEO, revert and iterate.
Big Tech Parallel: Monitoring dashboards (e.g., Datadog for system health).

6. Document the Process (Like Runbooks)

Create a playbook for future cleanups:
- Criteria for merging/deleting.
- Steps for redirects.
- Tools/scripts used.
Big Tech Parallel: Internal wikis (e.g., GitLab’s handbook) for repeatable processes.

7. Cultural Shift (Like Tech Debt Prioritization)

Schedule Regular Cleanups: Treat it like “spring cleaning”—quarterly or bi-annually.
Involve Others: If you have a team, assign roles (e.g., “Content Architect”).
Celebrate Wins: Deleting 100 low-value posts is progress!
Big Tech Parallel: “Hackathons” or “Fix-it Fridays” dedicated to reducing tech debt.

Tools to Help

Key Mindset Shifts

Delete is a Feature: Like removing dead code, deleting low-value posts improves maintainability.
Merging ≠ Losing Work: It’s repurposing content for better impact (like refactoring code for performance).
SEO is Long-Term: Short-term traffic dips may occur, but a cleaner site ranks better over time.
Legacy is Inevitable: Accept that some content will become outdated—plan for it.

Example Workflow

Month 1: Audit 400 posts → Tag 50 as “merge” and 30 as “delete.”
Month 2: Merge 10 posts into 2 guides; delete 10 with redirects. Monitor traffic.
Month 3: Automate redirects for deleted posts; merge another batch.
Ongoing: Schedule quarterly reviews.

Final Thought

Big tech companies don’t avoid legacy—they manage it systematically. Your blog is no different. By treating content like a codebase (audit, refactor, test, iterate), you’ll reduce friction and make future cleanups easier.

Would you like help designing a specific script or checklist for your platform (e.g., WordPress, Ghost)?

Back

mistralai/mistral-medium-3.1

Donate