Automating Data Validation with LLMs | Generated by AI

Home 2025.10 English 中文 日本語 Español हिंदी Français Deutsch العربية 繁體中文

---

Yes, you can use large language models (LLMs) to automate data validation, especially for rule-based checks like ensuring journal lines are balanced. LLMs are not traditionally used for this purpose, but their natural language understanding and code generation capabilities make them a powerful tool for generating, interpreting, and even executing validation rules.

Here’s how you can leverage LLMs for data validation:

---

1. Rule Definition & Generation

• Natural Language to Rules: You can describe validation rules in plain English (e.g., “The sum of debit amounts must equal the sum of credit amounts for all journal entries”). The LLM can then:
  • Parse the rule.
  • Generate executable code (e.g., Python, SQL) to enforce the rule.
  • Output the code as a function or script.
• Example:
  • Input: “Check that the sum of all debit entries equals the sum of all credit entries in the journal.”
  • LLM Output:

    def validate_journal_balance(journal_entries):
        total_debit = sum(entry['debit'] for entry in journal_entries)
        total_credit = sum(entry['credit'] for entry in journal_entries)
        return total_debit == total_credit
    

---

2. Integration with Data Pipelines

• Automated Validation:
  • The generated code can be integrated into your data ingestion pipeline (e.g., using Python, Apache Spark, or SQL).
  • When new data is ingested, the validation function runs automatically.
  • If the rule fails, the system can flag the issue or reject the data.
• Example Workflow:
  1. Data is ingested (e.g., CSV, database table).
  2. The LLM-generated validation function is called.
  3. If the function returns False, the system logs an error or alerts the user.

---

3. Dynamic Rule Updates

• Adaptability:
  • If validation rules change (e.g., new compliance requirements), you can update the natural language description.
  • The LLM regenerates the validation logic, reducing manual coding effort.

---

4. Handling Complex Rules

• Multi-step Validation:
  • LLMs can generate complex validation logic, such as:
    • Cross-field checks (e.g., “If the transaction type is ‘refund’, the amount must be negative”).
    • Temporal checks (e.g., “No future-dated transactions are allowed”).
    • Statistical checks (e.g., “Flag any journal entry where the amount is 3 standard deviations above the monthly average”).

---

5. Tools and Frameworks

• LLM as a Code Generator:
  • Use LLMs (like Mistral, GPT-4, or Claude) to generate validation scripts.
  • Integrate with tools like:
    • Python/Pandas for in-memory validation.
    • SQL for database-level checks.
    • Apache Spark for large-scale data validation.
    • Airflow/Dagster for orchestration.
• Example Stack:
  • Input: Natural language rule → LLM → Python/SQL validation script → Data Pipeline → Alert/Log.

---

6. Limitations and Considerations

• Accuracy:
  • Always review LLM-generated code for correctness, especially for financial or compliance-critical systems.
• Performance:
  • For large datasets, ensure the generated validation logic is optimized (e.g., vectorized operations in Pandas).
• Security:
  • Avoid exposing sensitive data to the LLM. Use synthetic data or anonymized examples for rule generation.

---

Example: End-to-End Validation with an LLM

1. User Input: “Create a validation rule to ensure all journal entries have a unique transaction ID and the sum of debits equals the sum of credits.”

2. LLM Output:

   def validate_journal(journal_entries):
       # Check for unique transaction IDs
       transaction_ids = [entry['transaction_id'] for entry in journal_entries]
       if len(transaction_ids) != len(set(transaction_ids)):
           return False, "Duplicate transaction IDs found."
   
       # Check debit/credit balance
       total_debit = sum(entry['debit'] for entry in journal_entries)
       total_credit = sum(entry['credit'] for entry in journal_entries)
       if total_debit != total_credit:
           return False, f"Debits ({total_debit}) do not equal credits ({total_credit})."
   
       return True, "Validation passed."
   

3. Integration:
   • Call validate_journal() during data ingestion.
   • Log or reject invalid entries.

---

How to Get Started

1. Define Your Rules: Start with a list of validation rules in natural language.
2. Prompt the LLM: Ask the LLM to generate code for each rule.
3. Test and Integrate: Test the generated code with sample data, then integrate it into your pipeline.
4. Monitor and Iterate: Refine rules and logic as needed.

---

---

Back

mistralai/mistral-medium-3.1

Donate