Singapores Zero Corruption Success Model

Singapores Zero Corruption Success Model | Generated by AI

Home 2026.02

Question: Why is Singapore so low in corruption?

Answer:

Singapore consistently ranks among the least corrupt countries in the world. In the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2025 by Transparency International, Singapore scored 84/100 and ranked 3rd globally (behind only Denmark and Finland in recent years), making it the least corrupt in Asia and the Asia-Pacific region.

Several key factors explain why corruption remains very low in Singapore:

Strong political will and leadership — Since independence in 1965 (and even from self-government in 1959 under the People’s Action Party), leaders like Lee Kuan Yew prioritized building an incorruptible government. They led by personal example and made zero tolerance for corruption a core national value, embedding a culture of integrity into society.
Independent and powerful anti-corruption agency — The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB), established in 1952 but significantly strengthened post-1959, operates independently under the Prime Minister’s Office. It investigates both public and private sector corruption impartially, with broad powers (including extraterritorial jurisdiction for Singaporeans abroad).
Strict and comprehensive laws — The Prevention of Corruption Act (PCA) provides harsh penalties: up to 7 years imprisonment and/or S$100,000 fine per charge (higher for public contracts), plus confiscation of ill-gotten gains. Laws cover bribery in all forms (monetary and non-monetary) and apply to both sectors.
High salaries for public officials — To remove financial temptation, civil servants and ministers receive competitive pay comparable to top private-sector roles. This addresses one root cause of corruption (low salaries) identified in early studies and attracts talented, honest people to government service.
Effective enforcement and deterrence — The CPIB acts swiftly without fear or favor, even against high-profile cases. This creates strong deterrence — people know the risks outweigh any potential gains.
Meritocratic system and reduced opportunities — Singapore’s efficient, rules-based bureaucracy minimizes discretionary power that often breeds corruption. Strict procurement, transparency in public services, and a vigilant society (where citizens report wrongdoing) further limit opportunities.
Societal culture — Over decades, a zero-tolerance mindset has become ingrained, supported by education, public campaigns, and consistent enforcement.

These elements combine to create a robust framework: political commitment + strong institutions + preventive measures + harsh deterrence + societal support. While no system is perfect (rare scandals still occur and are swiftly addressed), Singapore’s approach has made it a global model for low corruption.

References:

Back Donate