Starbucks Loses Ground in China | Generated by AI
Starbucks has been losing ground in China’s coffee market to local rivals like Luckin Coffee, Cotti Coffee, and Manner, with its market share dropping from 34% in 2019 to just 14% by 2024. This shift reflects a combination of aggressive local competition, evolving consumer habits, and broader economic challenges. Luckin, in particular, has surged ahead, surpassing Starbucks in store count (over 24,000 vs. Starbucks’ roughly 7,700 as of early 2025) and revenue in China starting in 2023. Below are the key reasons behind Starbucks’ struggles.
Aggressive Pricing and Value Focus
Chinese consumers, especially younger urbanites and the middle class, are increasingly price-sensitive amid an economic slowdown and post-pandemic caution. Luckin offers lattes and Americanos at roughly half the price of Starbucks equivalents—often 10-20 RMB ($1.40-$2.80) vs. Starbucks’ 30-40 RMB—through constant discounts, coupons, and promotions. This has eroded Starbucks’ premium positioning, leading to an 8% decline in same-store sales in fiscal 2024 and stagnant revenue of about $3 billion annually since 2022.
Rapid Scale and Expansion Model
Luckin and other locals have scaled explosively using a lean, no-frills approach: small-format “takeout-only” stores in high-traffic spots like campuses and subways, plus franchising and partnerships for quick entry into lower-tier cities. Starbucks’ reliance on fully company-owned, larger “third place” cafes has slowed its growth and raised costs, limiting flexibility in a market where speed wins.
Digital and Delivery Dominance
Luckin was built as a mobile-first brand, with seamless app ordering, Alipay integration, and tech-driven delivery via platforms like Meituan—catering to China’s on-the-go, app-obsessed consumers. Starbucks entered digital later and more cautiously, focusing on in-store experiences, which has hurt it as delivery now accounts for a huge share of coffee sales. Luckin’s model allows for hyper-localized, data-driven menu tweaks, like monthly flavor launches.
Shifting Consumer Preferences and Nationalism
Tastes are evolving toward convenient, trendy, and affordable options over aspirational Western luxury. Luckin taps into this with rapid innovation (e.g., seasonal local flavors) and a “patriotic” image as a homegrown success story, boosted by U.S.-China tensions. Starbucks’ slower adaptation—despite efforts like green tea lattes—has left it feeling outdated, while nationalism favors brands seen as authentically Chinese.
Service and Experience Erosion
Starbucks’ cost-cutting amid slumping sales has led to complaints of rushed, impersonal service, undermining its core “third place” appeal. Competitors like Luckin prioritize efficiency without the premium pretense, maintaining perceived value at lower costs.
In a dramatic recent move, Starbucks announced on November 3, 2025, that it’s selling a controlling 60% stake in its China operations to investment firm Boyu Capital for about $4 billion, forming a joint venture while retaining 40% ownership and full brand control. This values the business at over $13 billion total and signals a strategic pivot to leverage local expertise against ongoing competition.
Freshly brewed case study: why Starbucks is Struggling in China
Starbucks is struggling to grow sales in China. Here’s why
Starbucks to sell control of China business to Boyu Capital in $4 billion deal