Measure Wi-Fi, Fix Zoom Lag Properly

Measure Wi-Fi, Fix Zoom Lag Properly | Generated by AI

Home 2026.02

Question: What do you think about the importance of proper measurements when troubleshooting home Wi-Fi issues (such as Zoom lag in a duplex with a wireless repeater), rather than relying only on subjective feelings, and considering factors like different times of day?

Answer:

Yes, you’re 100% correct — reliable, repeatable measurement is the single most important thing when trying to improve or debug home networking, especially in a challenging environment like a two-floor duplex with a wireless repeater.

Subjective feelings (“it feels better”, “Zoom is smoother now”) are very misleading because:

Human perception of delay is non-linear (50 ms extra lag is often barely noticeable, but 200–400 ms suddenly feels terrible)
Placebo effect is strong
Memory of “before” vs “after” is unreliable
You tend to test right after making a change → during a temporarily quiet RF environment

Why measurements matter more in this exact scenario

Your setup (floor 1 main router → wireless repeater on floor 2) is one of the most fragile common home network topologies:

Every hop over Wi-Fi halves effective throughput in practice (even with good repeaters)
10 meters vertical + floor penetration usually means heavy signal attenuation (concrete/steel rebar can make it worse)
5 GHz has poor penetration → most repeaters fall back to 2.4 GHz for the uplink → low speed + high interference
2.4 GHz band is almost always congested in apartment buildings

Because of all these variables, small changes (moving router 1 meter, changing channel, time of day) can swing latency/jitter/packet loss dramatically.

What actually helps (measurement-first mindset)

Here are the most useful measurements you should collect, roughly in order of priority for your Zoom lag problem:

Actual application metrics during real meetings (best signal of truth)
- Use Zoom statistics (click the upward arrow during meeting → Statistics):
  - Network sending/receiving latency
  - Jitter
  - Packet loss %
  - Bandwidth used
- Keep the Statistics window open and take screenshots every 2–3 minutes during different times of day
Continuous ping + jitter measurement
- ping -n 300 zoom.us or better: ping to the nearest Zoom POP (you can find it via pingzoom.net or traceroute during meeting)
- Even better: use mtr (WinMTR on Windows, mtr on macOS/Linux) to the Zoom server — shows packet loss and jitter hop by hop
Wi-Fi link quality between repeater and main router
- Log into the repeater’s web interface (usually 192.168.0.254 or similar) and check:
  - Signal strength (RSSI) of the connection to main router (aim for ≥ -65 dBm, ideally -55 or better)
  - Link rate (Mbps) — if it’s stuck at 54 Mbps or 72 Mbps on 2.4 GHz, that’s your bottleneck
  - Channel utilization / interference
Speed & bufferbloat test at different times
- waveform.com/tools/bufferbloat or dslreports.com/speedtest
- Run 5–10 times at peak evening hours vs early morning
Simple repeatable throughput test between floors
- iperf3 between a wired PC on floor 1 and wireless PC on floor 2
- Or just large file copy from NAS/PC on floor 1 to floor 2 laptop

Quick thoughts on your attempts so far

Moving main router out of cabinet → usually helps (reduces 3–8 dB attenuation)
10 m fiber + AP in bridge mode on floor 2 → should be dramatically better than repeater (if you actually did this wired backhaul)
Coaxial MoCA → excellent choice if coax exists between floors (usually gives 400–900 Mbps reliable)
Macao SIM card → very good for upload-sensitive applications like Zoom when mainland ISPs have poor international routing

If wired backhaul (fiber/MoCA/Ethernet) is possible and still has bad Zoom performance, then the problem is most likely:

ISP → international routing / CGNAT / QoS throttling
Apartment shared riser congestion
Zoom server you connect to is far away

In that case measurements to international destinations (ping/ traceroute / iperf to US/EU servers) become even more important.

Bottom line

You’re thinking the right way: feelings lie, numbers don’t.

The people who fix Wi-Fi problems fastest are usually the ones who obsessively collect before/after numbers instead of randomly trying configurations.

Keep measuring the same way (same Zoom call participants, same time window, same test target) — that’s how you actually know whether a change helped.

References:

None (general networking knowledge and common troubleshooting practices)

Back Donate